The pricing is meant to make pipeline diagnosis easy to buy — and implementation easy to separate.
The Pipeline Revival Audit starts at $197 because the first job is not to rebuild your whole sales process or install a bigger CRM stack. The first job is to identify where recoverable revenue is still hiding, which stale segment deserves the first push, and what a usable 14-day revival plan should look like.
This page explains why the audit is priced lower than implementation, what is included, what is intentionally excluded, and when it makes sense to step up to a larger engagement.
Why the audit is not priced like consulting
The offer is designed to answer one expensive question fast: where is the easiest recoverable pipeline already sitting inside the business?
Low-friction diagnosis
$197 is low enough to let an owner buy clarity without turning it into a giant budget conversation. If stale opportunities are real, diagnosis should be easier to approve than a broad consulting engagement.
Focused scope
The audit does not try to fix every sales, ops, and follow-up issue at once. It narrows the problem to the most recoverable stale segment, likely revenue at risk, and the best first reactivation move.
Implementation stays separate
Execution can range from a simple message cleanup to full CRM workflow repair. Keeping implementation out of the audit price protects buyers from paying for work they may not need yet.
What $197 buys
The audit is a clarity product, not a vague discovery call.
Included
- Review of stale lead, proposal, and no-decision patterns described in intake
- Prioritized segment map for the first revival pass
- Recoverable pipeline estimate range
- Recommended 14-day reactivation plan
- Reply-handling and follow-up guidance for the first push
Not included
- CRM rebuilds or automation implementation
- Done-for-you outbound execution
- Full sales process redesign
- Net-new lead generation strategy
- Open-ended consulting time after delivery
Pricing logic, step by step
The offer stack is supposed to match decision sequence, not force a giant commitment up front.
1. Buy clarity first
If the business already suspects dead opportunities are piling up, the smartest first spend is usually diagnosis. That is why the audit price is closer to a serious internal review than to a retainer.
2. Confirm the best first segment
Not every stale bucket deserves the same energy. The audit is priced to produce one specific prioritization decision: which pool should the team attack first?
3. Escalate only if the economics justify it
If the audit shows enough recoverable value and the team wants help executing, then implementation becomes a separate, higher-ticket decision backed by clearer numbers.
When the audit is cheap — and when it is not
The same $197 can feel trivial or expensive depending on the condition of the pipeline.
Cheap if…
- One reopened deal could pay for it easily
- The owner keeps guessing about how much stale pipeline is really there
- The team wants to stop buying more attention before fixing follow-up leakage
- The business needs a narrower next move, not another giant project
Too expensive if…
- There is almost no old pipeline to inspect
- No one will act on the 14-day plan after delivery
- The real need is top-of-funnel creation, not revival
- The owner still does not believe any stale-opportunity leak exists
Use the shortest page that resolves the pricing doubt
If price hesitation is really a different kind of uncertainty, solve that directly.
Need proof the leak might be real?
Need to know what arrives?
Need to know whether to buy implementation instead?
Compare service offers
See implementation path
Check fit before buying
The audit is priced to make the first serious decision easier
You should not need to jump straight into a bigger engagement just to learn whether neglected pipeline is hiding recoverable revenue. Buy clarity first. Escalate only if the numbers and the situation justify it.